About ECO

ECO: Environmental Community Organization is a greater Cincinnati 501(c)(3) non-profit organization.  ECO preserves community and environmental health as a network of dedicated individuals through organizing with communities, action to hold industry and government accountable, and education efforts.

This hierarchy shows the foundational strategic principles of ECO, which depicts our theory of change. The foundations of public participation and transparency lead to good governance and should ultimately lead to Environmental Justice, Health, and Sustainability. We integrate this approach into all of our priority campaigns.

ECO: Environmental Community Organization
816 Van Nes Drive
Cincinnati, Ohio 45246

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required

ECO is a proud member of Community Shares of Greater Cincinnati.

Food Health and the Environment

Concerned about health, environment and climate change?

Join Sierra Club, PlantPure Nation and ECO for a free movie showing of PlantPure Nationplant pure


When: April 30, 2016, Saturday 3 p.m.

Where: First Unitarian Church , 529 Linton Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45219    Parking is free and available across the street

vegan snacks will be served

Eating locally grown plant based food helps protect the environment, reduce greenhouse gases and very importantly, can greatly improve your health and even reverse diseases. This film shows the dramatic results when people change their eating and how hard this is being fought by the meat and dairy industries.

Preeti Bansal Kshirsagar, Plant Pure Nation – Regional Manager Midwest,

MPH – Human Nutrition and Public Health Genetics, University of Michigan will lead a discussion of plant-based eating.

Tired of Cincinnati and Hamilton County Fighting Over MSD?

Here are ECO’s recommendations. Read the full document here.

Governance of the Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnati by Hamilton County and the City of Cincinnati

February 2016

Executive Summary

The shared governance of MSDGC lacks shared purposes and goals. Disputes lead to litigation, only to be followed by more disputes. Consent decree work has been delayed threatening missed deadlines, fines and penalties.

We recommend that the MSDGC shared governance be ended as soon as possible and one public entity put in charge. This includes termination of the 1968 agreement and addressing worker transitions and pension issues.

Past oversight of the MSDGC did not insure compliance with the law or proper maintenance of assets. Public input was limited and most citizens had little idea of the extent of sewer problems. This has contributed to making the sewer district more costly, particularly by delaying needed work.

Full governance – management, operation, prioritization, budgeting, ownership of assets and property, compliance, etc. – should be transparent, and accountable to the public, thereby avoiding inappropriate contracting and delays in compliance with laws and the consent decree.

Some have suggested splitting the district up into 2 or more districts. An equitable distribution of assets that have had varying levels of improvements, replacements, or new builds – or none of these – over the past 50 years would be difficult. Furthermore sewer sheds may include two or three political jurisdictions. Previously Judge Spiegel would not permit the city of Loveland to leave the District; it should remain whole.

We recommend that the sewers district remain one sewer district.

The success of either a county sewer district, governed by the Board of Commissioners or a regional sewer district, governed by a Board of Trustees depends on the intent and ability of either Board to provide oversight to the sewer district, and comply with legal requirements.

An independent citizen oversight “watchdog” committee, with the resources and authority to monitor, audit, insure transparency, accountability, and public participation, is key to moving forward.